When You Need A Lawyer Who
Will Fight For You

TCE Archives

CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE? Did School Officials Send Kids to TCE-Contaminated Bronx School for 20 Years?

Something really wrong happened here. Bronx Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott just announced the closing of the Bronx New School.  Walcott said that the soil at the school-- and the air that the kids breathe at the school--are soaked with a carcinogen known as trichloroethylene, or TCE.  And not just a little bit of TCE.  Contamination in the air was up to 10,000 times so called "safe" levels. [See this 8/19/11 media article]. The revelation that a school is contaminated is always jarring.  Last week, I wrote about air contamination (high levels of lead) at a public elementary school in Chicago's Pilsen community (see my blog from last week).  That school's 500 children are threatened by having to breathe this lead, and it was particularly galling to learn that Illinois environmental officials had long-resisted the requests of local families to test the air at the school. But, for as bad as the Pilsen situation is, this situation at the Bronx New School is even worse.....maybe the worst I have ever heard of.  Why?  One reason is that school officials knew since last February of the TCE contamination at the school--and then waited 6 months to tell parents about it.  In other words, 300 kids went to the Bronx New School for most of last semester, at a time when school officials knew that it was not safe for them to be there.  That's an outrage. But even more outrageous is the fact that there should never have been a school there in the first place.  The Bronx New School is, believe it or not, a former industrial plant that was known to have used TCE and other dangerous chemicals for perhaps as long as 70 years.  Ignoring this huge red flag, the Board of Education leased the site 20 years ago.  Then, despite knowing that it had been an industrial site, and despite a public record documenting the use there of dangerous chemicals, the Board evidently never bothered to do what any D+  science student would know to do:  test the property before you start sending kids there for 7 hours a day. Here's how reckless this is:  in a terrific piece of reporting, Juan Gonzalez of the New York Daily News describes how he hired an environmental firm which, 24 hours later, had produced a 241-page report documenting the dangerous chemical history at the industrial site that would become the Bronx New School.  In other words, Mr. Gonzalez discovered in a single day what the school board had failed to discover in twenty years. Rage and fear and guilt now dominate the thoughts of the parents who trusted school officials, and sent their children to the New Bronx School for the past 20 years.  Those families--and evidently there were many--who have wondered whether the headaches, dizziness and other illnesses afflicting their children were connected to the school today have good reason to be afraid....and angry. Doctors are now advising that their children be tested for evidence of exposure to the chemicals known to pollute the soil and air at the school.  Is there anything more awful? Sadly, what I have learned from years of fighting pollution and polluters, is that when children are in environmental harms' way, it is irresponsible adults who have put them there.  For the children at the Pilsen school, it's a polluter down the road who is belching lead into the air that they breathe, and the so-called "environmental protectors" in Illinois government who so callously refused for years to take seriously these kids' health.  For the children at the New Bronx School, it's the owner of the highly-contaminated industrial site who thought it would be OK to lease it out for a school, and, mainly, the apparently reckless people at the school board who--charged with protecting the lives of these children--never thought that their lives might be in danger at a school located on a toxin-laced industrial site. When we hear news like this, we often say, "there should be a law.....people should not be allowed to do this to children."  Well, as it turns out, we don't need a new law.  Right now--without putting any new laws on the books-- people are not allowed to do this to children.  There are environmental laws that forbid sending children to a school like this, for example. There are criminal laws, too.  And, particularly in the case of the New Bronx School, prosecutors need to look hard at using them.  All over this country, there are laws that put people in jail for "recklessly endangering" the lives of children.  These laws forbid adults from dimwittedly putting children in harms' way.  Especially when the adults have the duty to keep those kids safe.  After all, these children are not strangers to the adults who run the school board and the school.  They are the very children whom those adults are paid to protect. I'm having a hard time imagining the excuse that will work here.  And I'm having a hard time imagining that, unless someone really gets punished for what the adults did to the children at the Bronx New School, we will be a society that can truly claim to give a damn about protecting its children.

How TCE and PCE Can Harm Us: Expert Information You Can Trust

If you have reason to research how chemicals can harm your family-say, for example, your water supply has been found to be contaminated-please be careful. There is a lot of "information" available on the internet, but not all of it is reliable. In the unreliable category are studies performed or funded by the companies who manufacture those chemicals, or use them in their industrial processes. They have hundreds of millions, maybe billions, of dollars to gain by convincing us that their chemicals are safe. And while this extraordinary financial stake does not necessarily make their research false, common sense tells us that it may well cause them to resolve the scientific grey areas in favor of a conclusion that chemicals are safe, or not as dangerous as perhaps they truly are. That alone should cause you to look elsewhere for information to which you can trust your family's health.

Stop the $1 Billion Development in Los Angeles Until the TCE Contamination is Cleaned Up

los-angeles-231612_1920.jpgIt's such a compelling story: A 10-years-in-the-making plan to pour $1 billion into the redevelopment of Jordan Downs, a once-dangerous, crime ridden public housing project in the Watts neighborhood of Los Angeles, that had been the stage for nationally-televised riots in the 1960's. The idea is to convert what had been 700 badly scarred public housing units into a beautiful, mixed income neighborhood of 1,400 units, shops and park space. A real monument to progress and understanding.

WHAT THE PEOPLE OF NONANTUM NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TCE VAPOR CONTAMINATION

For the last 17 years, I and a team of lawyers have been representing families threatened by TCE contamination in their water supply, in the groundwater underneath their homes, and in the air inside their homes (called "vapor intrusion"). Recent reports in the media unfortunately describe how TCE, disposed of years ago in Nonantum, Massachusetts has seeped into the groundwater about 60 feet below the surface, and, after turning into gas ('vapor"), has risen back up through the soil and intruded into the breathing space of area homes.

Find Out ASAP If There is TCE Vapor Intrusion in Homes in Elmira, New York

Last week, New York's Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) announced that chemical contamination discovered at the former Triple Cities Metal Finishing plant in Elmira, New York "presents a significant threat to public health and/or the environment".  DEC has determined that industrial chemicals--including TCE--once used at the plant in its electroplating operation have contaminated the property's "soil, groundwater and soil vapor at levels exceeding applicable standards."1 Cutting through the bureaucrat-speak, this means that nasty chemicals once used at the plant may have spread to the nearby neighborhood, and may now be underneath, or even inside, the homes there. While DEC says it wants to find out if, in fact, that has happened--and that is a good and necessary step for DEC to take--DEC must take that step urgently. Now. In my experience, it can take government years or even decades to find out if dangerous chemicals have spread from an industrial site into a neighborhood.  There are lots of reasons why it takes so long--complicated science, lack of money, political resistance to learning the truth, etc.--but none of the reasons is a good one. Here, TCE--which is but one of the chemicals already found in soil, groundwater and soil vapor at the Elmira plant--is a carcinogen.  It is associated with cancer of the kidney, liver, cervix and lymphatic system.  Elmira families may have TCE on their properties or in the air they breathe in their homes.  These families should not have to wait years to find out if this has happened or, hopefully, to get the peace of mind that comes from finding out that the chemicals did not reach their neighborhood after all. I understand that the Elmira area is served by a municipal water system, which is very good news.  It means that any of the TCE or other chemicals that might have seeped into the groundwater over the years is not entering homes through faucets and shower heads. But that isn't the whole story.  Because TCE (among other chemicals) "volatilizes"--meaning TCE turns into vapor or gas--it can migrate upward from contaminated groundwater, and slip quietly into the breathing space of homes sitting above the groundwater.  This is a simple graphic depiction of this process called "vapor intrusion":

STUDY LINKS VAPOR INTRUSION TO BIRTH DEFECTS

For decades, hundreds of homes in a section of Union, New York known as Endicott have been sitting above a plume of TCE and PCE contaminated groundwater.  TCE and PCE are man-made solvents historically used by corporations to strip grease and grime off metal parts.  Endicott is just south of a former IBM manufacturing facility that released thousands of gallons of these solvents into the environment.  One of these solvents, TCE, has recently been classified as a known human carcinogen by the USEPA.  Although the dangers of drinking TCE and PCE laced-water have been documented for years, less research has been devoted to the inhalation of TCE and PCE.  Endicott, with its long history of groundwater contamination, provided researchers with valuable insights into the dangers of inhaling TCE and PCE. The Endicott Study, conducted by researchers at New York's State Department of Health is one of the first studies to examine the health effects of breathing PCE and TCE contaminated air from vapor intrusion.  Vapor intrusion is the process whereby TCE and PCE in groundwater beneath homes vaporizes and moves up through the ground and into the air inside homes. Department of Health Researchers looked at health statistics from 1,440 live births to mothers living above the Endicott groundwater plume between 1978 and 2002, and compared them to health related statistics for children born throughout New York.  Their findings were alarming.  The researchers found that children born in the Endicott Study area had higher rates of adverse health issues including heart defects and low birth weight.  In addition to these findings, a previous health statistics review of the Endicott area by the Department of Health also found a significant elevation in the number of kidney and testicular cancers. This study is significant because it provides tangible support for the proposition that inhalation of TCE and PCE via vapor intrusion can be dangerous to human health.  Our hope is that the Endicott Study, which is slated for publication in Environmental Health Perspectives, will be used by state and federal environmental and public health regulators as support for tougher clean-up standards at contaminated industrial sites and to force the corporate polluters responsible for environmental contamination to respond quickly to protect homeowners and their families from the health threats posed by vapor intrusion.

STIFF-ARM CITY: Chancellor and Department of Education Break Promise to Families of Highly Contaminated Bronx New School

Before we get to the broken promise, let's first re-cap DOE's disregard for the health of the children who have attended The Bronx New School for the last 20 years [feel free to visit my previous blogs on this subject dated: 8/30, 8/26, and 8/22. ] (1) In 1992, DOE signs a 20-year lease to convert an old industrial site - - with a history of heavy use of toxic chemicals - -  into an elementary school (which became The Bronx New School). (2) Even though there are abundant, publicly-available records showing that the site may be contaminated, DOE does not take the couple of hours needed to find and read these records. (3) Likewise, DOE does not test - - at a cost of only a few thousand dollars - -  the old industrial site, to find out if it was contaminated... before DOE sends young children, teachers and administrators there for 8 hours every day. (4) Nearly twenty years go by.  Many hundreds of students attend, and then graduate from, The Bronx New School.  Still no testing. (5) Until January 2011. That's when the 20-year lease on The Bronx New School site is up, and DOE wants to re-lease.  DOE says that now it must do environmental testing.  Before a new lease can be signed.  Note that, for the past 20 years, concern for the health of the students never made DOE think that it should do environmental testing.  DOE says that there's a law that mandates testing before re-leasing a building.  Evidently, there is no law that forbids making a school out of a contaminated old industrial site. . . or that mandates reading public records or testing to see if a site is safe before sending children there in the first place. (6) Environmental tests taken in January of this year - - and then again in March, April and May - - reveal extremely high levels of  a chemical known as "TCE" in the air in the cafeteria, hallway and basement of the school.  Levels up to 10,000 times what NewYork City's own Department of Health says is safe. TCE is one nasty chemical.  It's a known cancer-causer.   But it's colorless and odorless, so you don't see or smell that it's in the air.  Adults, and especially children, should not be breathing TCE.  The immune systems of children do not process toxins well, and so the toxins do more damage in children than in adults. (7) But DOE does not tell the parents of the children attending the school, or the school staff, about the TCE they are breathing.  Instead, DOE had the kids and staff finish out the school year (another 6 months), continuing to breathe the air that DOE (but no one else) knew was laced with a highly-toxic chemical. (8) In early August of this year - - well after the end of the school year - - a seemingly contrite Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott tells horrified parents for the first time of the TCE contamination, and that it is so bad that their children will no longer be attending school there. And then, on August 18, in response to public demands that former Bronx New School students be located and informed that their health might have been jeopardized while they attended the school, Wolcott promised two things.  First, he promised to make a master list of former students, so that they could be kept abreast of developments about the contamination at the school.  Second, he promised to hold additional informational meetings, presumably to share new information as it became available, and to answer questions from these suddenly very worried families.  And they have good reason to be worried, alarmed even.  The TCE levels detected at the school earlier this year - - if they are representative of past levels - - are high enough to cause serious illness to those breathing them for hours each day.  Also, because many years can pass between exposure to TCE and manifestation of the illness it can cause, students who attended the school years ago are right to believe that good health today does not mean they are "out of the woods" for contracting TCE-related disease. Walcott's promise of a list and informational meetings was made to a deserving and emotionally vulnerable audience. . . to quell their outrage and anguish.  The promise of the list was especially important.  The list would serve as a database of alumni of the New Bronx School, to allow for medical monitoring of those former students.  It would keep track of sickness patterns, and help these families force the state to take responsibility for medical treatment, if it can be shown that a former student's illness was caused by exposure to TCE at the school. Walcott's promise was made almost 4 months ago.  But today?  No list.  And no meetings. Current and former Bronx New School families have reminded Walcott of his promises. . . in phone calls and public statements they have made to try and reclaim his and DOE's attention.  But Walcott will not meet with them (instead meeting only with a select group of parents comprising the Parents' Association - - a meeting which reportedly did not include parents of the former students).  [See this December 21 Riverdale Press article: Parents say DOE ignored them after school toxin exposure] What's going on with Walcott and DOE?  Why are they hiding from these families?  More importantly, what are they hiding from these families? Why make promises to such vulnerable people, and then break them?  There is no one in the entire New York school system more deserving of DOE's time and attention than these families. Since 1992, DOE failed in its most fundamental responsibility to protect the children of The New Bronx School.  Now, it's failing to protect them. . . again.  How dare DOE stiff-arm these families as they try to understand what has happened to their children.

STAND UP AND FIGHT... YOU CAN SHAME YOUR GOVERNMENT INTO DOING SOMETHING ABOUT CONTAMINATION IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD

This is a hopeful story.  But it must first wind its way through some seemingly discouraging territory.  Hang with me, though, and we'll get to the hopeful part.  I promise. Here's the discouraging part: You cannot trust your government to tell you that your air or water is contaminated.  Or to protect you against the contamination. That's a terrible thing to say.  But it must be said, because it's true.  Here's just some of the evidence that we've seen: Our First Case:  Early on, the state EPA was about to give a polluted industrial property an environmental "clean bill of health" (called a "No Further Remediation" letter).  This means that EPA was about to declare that the nasty chemicals (mostly TCE) dumped on the company's property could not migrate off of it in groundwater.  We didn't believe it.  So we spent our own money to test the groundwater in our clients' neighborhood across the street. We found TCE all over the place.  In fact, as more testing over the next few months would prove, TCE from the industrial property had traveled almost three miles off-site. Our Most Recent Case:  In a case we just filed in Madison, Wisconsin, the state's environmental agency (the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources: "DNR") earlier this year asked a local manufacturer to test in and around the homes of some of the families living behind the company to see if a chemical (mostly PCE) spilled years ago on company property had moved off site.  The testing turned up PCE almost everywhere they looked... in the dirt in the families' yards; in the groundwater running under the neighborhood; in gas  underneath some of the homes; and even in the air that people breathe literally inside one of the homes.  [See our Complaint filed on 10-20-11]  So, in forcing this testing, government did its job, right? Hardly. DNR knew since at least 1994 that the company's property was contaminated with PCE, and that there were families living only 50 feet away.  And yet DNR waited nearly 17 years to see if any of these families had been affected by the PCE. Pilsen:  Families in Chicago's largely Latino Pilsen community had been begging the Illinois EPA for years to test local neighborhoods to see if lead - - a known cause of neurological injury to children - -  from two local plants was contaminating the community's air.  Finally, in 2011, EPA relented, and put a lead monitor on the roof of the local elementary school, where 500 children breathe the air for 6-7 hours each weekday.   Dangerously high levels of lead were found in the air at the school. [see my previous blog dated 8/10/11 for further details on the Pilsen situation]  Even though the foot-dragging Illinois EPA didn't deserve it, the people of Pilsen have had the good grace to not say, "We told you so." Now, thousands of children who attended that elementary school over the years are left to worry whether they have been injured by lead exposure that their government had to be begged to take seriously. The Bronx New School:  In 1991, New York public school officials made the horrifyingly bad decision to rent an old industrial site and use it for an elementary school.  Despite an extensive, publicly-available record documenting environmental problems at this site, New York not only went ahead and housed the school there anyway, but did no testing at all to see if the school was even safe for the children to attend.  Then, in 2011 - 20 years and hundreds of young graduates later - New York finally got around to the testing. Guess what?  They found levels of TCE in the air inside and underneath the school that were up to 10,000 times higher than the level that the State of New York says is dangerous.  And even then, school administrators waited 6 months, until the end of the school year, to tell the parents that their kids' school was dangerous, and that the kids shouldn't go there anymore. [I've written several blogs on the Bronx situation - which are available here] Jana's Case:  A few years ago, we represented a teenage girl named Jana.  Jana had contracted a form of cancer known as Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma ("NHL"), caused by exposure throughout Jana's childhood to chemicals in her family's water supply that had been dumped years earlier by companies in a nearby industrial park.  Jana's family didn't know about the contamination... until Jana got sick. But the really sad part was that the State's EPA knew of the chemicals in the water... for many years... and didn't tell Jana's family.  So, we helped to pass a new "Right to Know" law, which forced the State to notify families like Jana's that their air or water was polluted.  They actually needed a law to force them to do this... even though it's the most important part of their job. TCE causes cancer:   US EPA just classified TCE as a "known" human carcinogen.  [see our 10/4/11 blog on this subject: "At Long Last EPA Declares TCE To Be A Human Carcinogen]  It used to be a "possible", then a "suspected", human carcinogen.  EPA has now removed the doubt.  It says that significant exposure to TCE can in fact cause kidney and liver cancer, and NHL (like it did to Jana).  Other cancers, too.  This deadly chemical is one of the most common pollutants in our environment.  So, in labeling TCE as a "known" cancer-causer, EPA was doing its job, right?  Protecting the people with important information, right? Do you know how long EPA has been "studying" whether TCE should be classified as a "known" carcinogen?  Since 1987.  Almost a quarter century. This pathetic delay occurred because every time government got close to announcing the truth about TCE - "IT CAUSES CANCER" - the industry of TCE polluters and their lobbyists swung into action, and delayed government's final decision.   And they are at it again.  The next step that government needs to take is to change the TCE clean-up standards, i.e, lower the levels of "acceptable" concentrations of TCE, now that we know for sure it causes cancer.  This will make TCE clean-up at thousands of contaminated sites all over the country far more expensive for the companies who dumped it there.  So, the TCE polluters' lobby is hard at work... again.  Any bets on when we'll see the new TCE clean-up standards? * * * * And there's lots more where this came from.  Story after story about how government just does not protect people against environmental threats. In the 12 years that I've been representing the victims of contamination, government's failure to protect the people is the most predictable, and discouraging, thing.  Time after time, government just does not seem to give a damn.  Or even worse:  it's on the polluters side, dutifully telling the people that the toxins in their air and water just aren't that big of a deal, or that government just can't seem to figure out where they came from.  Or that there's no need to test, or test more. But here's the hopeful part.  Our experience proves that you can shame your government into doing its job to protect you and your family.  It's called "democracy".  And it turns out that democracy still works.  Not all the time, of course, and seldom quickly and certainly not perfectly.  But enough to make me believe that democracy still works. Here are the hopeful signs: Tonawanda, New York is a working class town outside of Buffalo.  Here's what we know from a great piece of reporting by The Center for Public Integrity [see this IWatch article dated 11/10/11: "Where regulators failed, citizens took action -- testing their own air"] After years of government refusals to take seriously her complaints about the "toxic blue haze" that was making her sick, Jeani Thompson and her neighbors decided to prove to their government that there was indeed a problem.  So, using buckets and hand-held vacuums, Jeani's group did the testing that their government had refused to do.  And, they found dangerously high levels of benzene and other chemicals in the air that they were breathing.  They brought their test results to environmental officials.  Then they organized a group of families living next to the plant they believed to be the source of the pollution.  These families would file reports whenever toxic soot would belch out of the plant, and make it hard to breathe, or stink up the neighborhood. Bottom line:  they shamed their government into action.  Environmental officials have now brought a host of civil and criminal enforcement actions against the plant.  There were even unannounced government inspections of the plant, and government's own testing of the local air quality - finally.  All of this revealed, not surprisingly, that the plant was a hell-hole of environmental violations; that the air was as bad or even worse than Jeani and her neighbors had claimed; and that plant employees were habitually "under-reporting" - by massive amounts - the volume of chemicals that the plant was emitting every year. In our contamination cases, we have learned the same thing as Jeani and her neighbors about getting government to do its job.  Because, as in Tonawanda, New York, each of our cases has shined a bright light on a terrible problem, and made it so that government could not look away. Let's just look at the cases I mentioned above: Our First Case.  Yes, it's true, that government was ready to sweep the entire problem under the rug.  But, that's not what happened.  When we did our own testing for the people - at a cost of only a couple hundred dollars per home - and found contamination, the EPA (finally) took notice.  We publicized the results of our tests.  EPA couldn't any longer pretend that there wasn't a problem.  So, the agency was forced to act.  In response to our test results, EPA representatives actually tested more than one hundred additional homes themselves.  They found that many of them were contaminated, and that the chemicals had traveled miles away from the plant in the groundwater. And something very good resulted:  many unsuspecting families in the area learned that they had a problem, and could begin to protect themselves. Our most Recent Case:  Yes, it's true that the DNR largely ignored a serious problem for 17 years.  There's really no forgiving that, and someone at DNR should lose his/her job over this.  But, when we and the families started making a lot of noise - very publicly - about how badly the DNR had let the people down, and was coddling the politically-connected polluting company, DNR was embarrassed into taking at least some action.  As things stand today, DNR is requiring the company to do more testing in the next year than it did in the first 17 years.  And the state's attorney general is now involved... so that, if the company drags its feet on this new round of testing, the state's chief law enforcement officer goes after them.  It's still not nearly enough, of course.  There are still far too many area families who do not know that they have a serious problem.  But it's progress. Pilsen and The Bronx New School:  Yes, it's true that the necessary testing came years too late.  But, in both communities, the testing has now been done, and local families can begin to identify and test the children who may have been hurt by the contamination.  Also, the Illinois Attorney General recently has filed what seems to be a pretty tough case against one of the lead polluters, and already has gotten the company to agree to operational changes that will significantly reduce lead contamination in the neighborhood.  Finally, the fact that government resisted testing for so long - and found dangerous levels of contamination once it did test - will forever serve as a weapon for the people in future battles over contamination in those communities.  They will always be able to say to school to officials and environmental agencies:  "Remember what happened the last time you told us everything was OK?  Remember what happened the last time you told us that no testing was necessary?" The point here is: whether it's Tonawanda or Pilsen or The Bronx or your neighborhood, families dealing with contamination, or suspecting contamination, must be both realistic and demanding.  You must realize that, left on its own, your government cannot be expected to protect you from environmental contamination.  But  you must also know that it can be expected to not want to be embarrassed. So, embarrass them.  Take the tests yourself, like Jeani Thompson and her neighbors did.  Like we did in our first case.  Go to the TV and newspaper reporters with the results, and your concerns about your health and property.  If you catch government failing to do its job to protect you, or siding with the polluter, make them pay the price.  Demand the firing or resignation of the officials who would not take you seriously.  Push for the passage of a new law (like Jana's law) or ordinance to forbid government from refusing ever again to do the necessary testing. Or to tell you the results.  Publicly remind government officials that they were wrong about something very important to you and your family.  And about how difficult it will be for them to ever again earn your trust. You can even file a lawsuit, not only to prove how dangerous and wide-spread the contamination is, but also to expose how slow and ineffective, and polluter-friendly, government's response has been. Shame them into doing their jobs.   It's the democratic thing to do.

AT LONG LAST EPA DECLARES TCE A HUMAN CARCINOGEN

After slow-walking the process consistent with its decades long standard operating procedure,  the U.S. EPA  finally recognized what credible scientists have been saying for many years: exposure to TCE causes cancer.  The earth is not flat after all.   On September 28, EPA released the final health assessment for trichloroethylene (TCE) to the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) database. IRIS is a human health assessment program that evaluates the latest science on chemicals in our environment. The final assessment characterizes the chemical as carcinogenic to humans and as a human non-cancer health hazard. So, what does this mean for us? TCE is the single most common industrial chemical which is polluting groundwater in this country.  Not only is it leaking from landfills all over the country, it is finding its way into our communities from reckless dumping practices at thousands of industrial sites from coast to coast. Because it is highly volatile, in addition to invading our ever diminishing water supplies, it seeps into our homes in vapor form and poisons the air we breathe 24-7.  For those of us who have been fighting corporate polluters, this action means that we should no longer have to deal with one of the many baseless arguments we see in case after case -  that TCE is harmless.  And that's a good thing. But, much more action on the part of those whose job it is to protect us must follow. Among other actions, EPA must act promptly to reduce the Maximum Contaminant Level for TCE, the amount of this poison which EPA allows to be present in our public water supplies. The MCL currently stands at 5 parts per billion for TCE, which is too high.  Any amount is too high.  EPA recognizes this and for years has had its goal for this chemical (MCLG) set at zero.  While industry pressure is likely to prevent EPA from reducing the MCL to zero, where it should be, prompt reduction of the drinking water standard must go forward.  So, we fight on.   Click here to read EPA's release.

Email Us For a Response

Schedule A Free Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

The Collins Law Firm, P.C.
1770 Park Street
Suite 200
Naperville, IL 60563

Toll Free: 866-480-8223
Phone: 630-687-9838
Fax: 630-527-1193
Naperville Law Office Map